🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.